If Congressman Cline thought he was going to make former Special Counsel Jack Smith look bad during Smith’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday, Cline should know that he only succeeded in making a fool of himself.
As Blue Virginia reported:
Cline attempted, falsely, to discredit Smith’s track record and competence, in part by referencing Smith’s prosecution of Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell for corruption. Recall that on September 14, 2014, McDonnell and his wife “were found guilty of public corruption charges” – “He was convicted of honest services wire fraud, obtaining property under color of official right, and extortion under color of official right.” Then, on July 10, 2015, “the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals… affirmed McDonnell’s conviction.” Finally, on June 27, 2016, the US Supreme Court “unanimously vacated McDonnell’s conviction…holding that the trial court’s construction of the statutory term ‘official act’ was too broad, encompassing activities such as setting up meetings, hosting parties and calling Virginia officials to discuss Williams’s business.” So basically, Jack Smith – as Chief of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section – was very successful in this prosecution all the way to the US Supreme Court, which as we’ve seen in recent years, OFTEN gets things badly wrong, often at odds with the “lower courts.” In this case, as Jack Smith explained, “the Supreme Court changed the law on what constituted an official act.”
Ben Cline also criticized Jack Smith for seeking a “gag order” against Donald Trump, because of Trump’s threats to witnesses in the election interference case against him. Cline dishonestly characterized this as violating the “principle that the government doesn’t silence political speech, in particular speech before it happens,” claiming (falsely) that there was no real world harm that you could articulate that justified giving the federal government the power to silence him as a presidential candidate.” As Jack Smith correctly explained, “The court granted those motions and found that the prosecutor did not have to wait until someone was harmed to make such a motion.” Smith also explained that the Court of Appeals agreed that there was a basis and that the threats to witnesses that came from the targeting by Donald Trump were real, and then we had a duty to protect them.” Cline basically blew that off, strongly implying that Trump’s statements about the cases against him had NOT “intimidated witnesses or prevented them from coming forward.” Again, Smith responded correctly – “I had evidence that he said ‘if you come after me, I’m coming after you’…he suggested a witness should be put to death.” And, Smith added, “The courts found that those sort of statements not only deter witnesses who’ve come forward; they deter witnesses who have yet to come forward.” Yet AGAIN, Cline blew this off, claiming Smith wasn’t “able to identify a single witness who didn’t come forward because they were intimidated by President Trump.” And yet again, Smith corrected Cline’s lying idiocy – “We had extremely thorough evidence that his statements were having an effect on the proceedings that is not permitted in any court of law in the United States.” And yet AGAIN, Cline acted as if these threats to witnesses were all a big joke or something (“I mean, if you can’t identify a single witness who’s intimidated…maybe you should reconsider the gag order.”). WTF? That’s really outrageous by Cline, and by that point most of us would have wanted to tell Clint to go f*** himself. Fortunately, Smith is a professional, kept his cool and responded, “Both courts upheld the orders and it is not incumbent on a prosecutor to wait until someone gets killed before they move for an order to protect the proceedings.” Smith added, again correctly, that “the First Amendment does not allow one to make statements that interfere with the administration of justice in a judicial proceeding” and recalled that, “in the days after Donald Trump made some of these statements, the district court in this case received vile threats, threats to the district court’s life in that environment,” so “I felt a duty as a prosecutor to make that motion, and I make no apologies.”
Cline, on the other hand, has a lot to apologize for.
Cline Watch 
Cline’s unprofessional questioning of Jack Smith was an embarrassment to all Virginians. You would think he would have thought before posing his questions, which had no basis in fact. I’m ready for the midterms.
LikeLike