With the support of Congressman Cline and every other Republican, the House of Representatives voted Wednesday for the “SAVE America Act.” It now goes to the Senate, where it is likely to be filibustered by Democrats.

While supposedly designed to prevent non-citizens from voting, it would in fact make voting difficult or impossible for huge numbers of eligible American citizens.

The SAVE America Act is essentially the same as the SAVE Act that Cline and other Republicans tried to push through in 2024. It would require people registering to vote to prove they are American citizens.

Virginia Congresswoman Jennifer McClellan explained her opposition to that bill:

McClellan noted that the only methods to prove citizenship under the SAVE Act “just happen to be the ones that cost money.”

“You won’t be able to use your state driver’s license,” she said, adding that the easiest option “you could use is a passport. It costs money. A lot of Americans don’t have passports.”

McClellan further noted that it can be difficult for some people to obtain their birth certificates, which can be necessary to prove citizenship, and those who have changed their names — for marriage or other reasons — often struggle to “reconcile that in order to prove their citizenship.”

McClellan said the issue is personal, invoking her family’s history with the poll tax.

“Look, I took my oath of office on the Bible in which my father kept his poll tax receipt,” she said. “I am not voting for a modern poll tax just so that they can say they’ve done something to keep noncitizen voters from doing something that is already illegal, punishable by up to five years in federal prison, and that there’s very little evidence is a widespread problem.”

This bill is based on the ridiculous premise that hordes of undocumented immigrants are illegally voting in US elections. For obvious reasons, undocumented people try to keep as low a profile as possible when it comes to the government. How many does Cline think are willing to risk imprisonment or deportation to register and vote?

The Brennan Center for Justice explains:

Imagine you’re an undocumented person living in the United States. You’ve come to this country seeking a better life for you and your family. Or maybe your parents brought you here seeking the same when you were a child. You spend your life living in very real fear that you might be noticed by the government and be deported — perhaps to a country you’ve never known. There’s an election coming up, the outcome of which will surely impact your life. But you know you can’t vote because you’re not a citizen. Would you risk everything — your freedom, your life in the United States, your ability to be near your family — just to cast a single ballot?

Of course you wouldn’t. It’s a federal crime for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. It’s also a crime under every state’s laws. In fact, under federal law, you could face up to five years in prison simply for registering to vote. It’s also a deportable offense for noncitizens to register or vote. And sure, people make bad decisions and commit crimes all the time. But this one is different: by committing the crime, you create a government record of your having committed it. In fact, it’s the creation of the government record — the registration form or the ballot cast — that is the crime. So, you’ve not only exposed yourself to prison time and deportation, you’ve put yourself on the government’s radar, and you’ve handed the government the evidence it needs to put you in prison or deport you. All so you could cast one vote. Who would do such a thing?

The answer is: just about no one. Every legitimate study ever done on the question shows that voting by noncitizens in state and federal elections is vanishingly rare. That includes the Brennan Center’s own study of 42 jurisdictions in the 2016 general election. We found that election officials in those places, who oversaw the tabulation of 23.5 million votes, referred only an estimated 30 incidents of suspected noncitizen voting for further investigation or prosecution. In other words, even suspected — not proven — noncitizen votes accounted for just 0.0001 percent of the votes cast.

The SAVE America Act is a “solution” to a non-existent problem. It’s performative nonsense that– in the name of “election security”– would deprive tens of millions of Americans of their democratic rights.

Congressman Cline and Joe Neguse of Colorado both serve on the House Judiciary Committee.

In a Cline Watch post last month, I observed that Neguse “is everything that Ben Cline isn’t. I mean that as a compliment.”

If you need more proof, compare their questioning of Donald Trump’s appalling attorney general Pam Bondi at a committee hearing on Wednesday.

Here’s Cline trying his best to prop up the increasingly desperate Bondi and Trump:

We've all seen the staggering fraud in Minnesota and across this country. Right here in the Commonwealth, corruption has been festering in the shadows. The people deserve the truth, and they deserve accountability. I look forward to working alongside @realDonaldTrump and… pic.twitter.com/G2yNUXhLTb

— Congressman Ben Cline (@RepBenCline) February 11, 2026

And here’s Neguse showing them up for incompetent and malevolent hypocrites they are:

NEGUSE: AG Bondi, that man works for you now, right? The man in that video from J6 yelling 'kill them!' at cops. His name is Jared Wise.BONDI: He does work for us, yes. I believe he was pardonedNEGUSE: And you expect hard-working police officers to believe you take law enforcement seriously?

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-02-11T18:28:01.307Z

Perhaps it’s a sign of Congressman Cline’s eagerness to prove he’s doing something for the people of the Sixth District that he’s bragging about obtaining $17 million in federal funds to expand a portion Interstate 81 that runs through the district.

For some purposes, $17 million is a lot of money. Not for highway expansion.

In 2018 the Virginia Department of Transportation estimated the cost of adding an additional lane to I-81 would be between $10 million and $15 million per mile.

So the $17 million that Cline is so proud of obtaining will provide for less than two miles of an additional lane for I-81– a highway that stretches 650 miles in both directions in Virginia alone.

In the comments to one of Cline’s Facebook posts, Abby Schweber wrote:

The I-81 expansion is a massive, multi-year effort composed of 65 separate capital projects and numerous operational improvements throughout the interstate’s 325-mile corridor in Virginia, costing hundreds of millions of dollars. The work started in 2023, when substantial funding was granted by Biden’s Infrastructure Act, which Ben Cline voted against. A lot of the work is already done.

Ben Cline’s tiny little $17 million add-on is his bid to claim credit for work done by others. We are not fooled.

To Cline’s credit, in 2024 he inserted a $42 million earmark in a government funding bill for improvements in the I-81 corridor. The catch: he then voted against the full package.

As Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi noted at the time, Cline was one of dozens of Republicans who chose to “vote no and take the dough.”

Last Friday morning Congressman Cline was one of the speakers at a so-called “town hall” in Staunton sponsored by the rightwing City Elders VA and the Family Foundation. This is the only sort of “town hall” Cline is willing to participate in these days.

The event was not publicized outside of Republican circles, but word got out and some non-supporters attended. One of them got the opportunity to ask Cline a question:

Representative Cline, what are you doing to keep Virginia safe from federal agents who are coming into neighborhoods, shooting people, shooting tear gas and stealing children? We’re seeing this in Minneapolis.

Here is Cline’s response:

In where? Minnesota. Minnesota. Okay, thank you. We were, anytime there is a death, we all are saddened by that and we want to avoid that kind of situation. What I have said throughout this process is as we seek to detain and repatriate those who are not here legally, we have to respect the law enforcement that is trying to perform that action, respect the rule of law, and as I would say exercise your First Amendment right to protest, but don’t interfere with law enforcement and the lawful performance of its duty. And there is action going on in Minnesota that is attempting to interfere with law enforcement as it seeks to perform that duty.

They are violent actions, they are organized, and in many cases, paid to interfere with law enforcement. And my request, my plea to my constituents, and anyone who is seeking to exercise their First Amendment right, please do so peacefully. And please do so in a way that is respectful of law enforcement and does not interfere with them. That’d be my request.

No acknowledgement of the violent actions of the federal agents who murdered two American citizens and brutalized countless others.

But when you claim that protesters are “paid to interfere with law enforcement,” you’d better have solid evidence to back it up.

While we wait for Cline to provide the evidence, let me note that the congressman himself is paid $174,000 a year, and he spends much of each year spouting nonsense like this.

Joe Neguse, who represents Colorado’s Second District in Congress, is everything that Ben Cline isn’t. I mean that as a compliment.

Among other distinctions, Neguse features the following on the home page of his Congressional website:

There is, of course, no similar count on Cline’s website or anywhere else. Maybe that’s because Cline hosted precisely one town hall (limited to a tiny number of constituents) during all of 2025.

As it happened, after Cline’s foolish questioning of former Special Counsel Jack Smith at a committee hearing Thursday, Neguse was the next committee member to face the witness. He took the opportunity to call out Cline.

My colleague from Virginia, a Republican colleague who was questioning you right before the break, do you know what he said in the days after January 6th? Let me share this with you. This is a quote of his from a press release on January 8th: “Congress stands united in our rejection of the violence that occurred this week, and I’ll continue to urge the swift prosecution of those involved to the fullest extent of the law.” Mr. Smith, this is theater. Republicans are trying to rewrite history. That’s what this is. Many of them were with us in the House chamber on January 6th. I remember it well. The chairman [Cline’s pal Jim Jordan] was there, as was I. There’s been a lot of discussion about witnesses today. Perhaps the chairman could muster the courage to call the four witnesses who I see, the American public may not see, I see standing behind you, Mr. Smith, the four police officers who risked everything, life and limb.

To do what? To protect the Republican members on the dais. It’s an outrage that they now sit here and have the audacity to try to rewrite history in front of the very officers who sacrificed everything to protect them.

Cline has never said a word about Donald Trump’s pardon of all the January 6 insurrectionists, including those who brutally assaulted law enforcement officers. Unlike some Republicans, he has never acknowledged that Trump had any role in provoking the violence. He voted against impeaching Trump for his role in the attack on the Capitol and against a bipartisan commission to investigate January 6. And he has shown no sympathy for in the officers who bear the physical and mental scars of that day.

Joe Neguse has Ben Cline pegged.

If Congressman Cline thought he was going to make former Special Counsel Jack Smith look bad during Smith’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday, Cline should know that he only succeeded in making a fool of himself.

As Blue Virginia reported:

Cline attempted, falsely, to discredit Smith’s track record and competence, in part by referencing Smith’s prosecution of Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell for corruption. Recall that on September 14, 2014, McDonnell and his wife “were found guilty of public corruption charges” – “He was convicted of honest services wire fraud, obtaining property under color of official right, and extortion under color of official right.” Then, on July 10, 2015, “the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals… affirmed McDonnell’s conviction.” Finally, on June 27, 2016, the US Supreme Court “unanimously vacated McDonnell’s conviction…holding that the trial court’s construction of the statutory term ‘official act’ was too broad, encompassing activities such as setting up meetings, hosting parties and calling Virginia officials to discuss Williams’s business.” So basically, Jack Smith – as Chief of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section – was very successful in this prosecution all the way to the US Supreme Court, which as we’ve seen in recent years, OFTEN gets things badly wrong, often at odds with the “lower courts.” In this case, as Jack Smith explained, “the Supreme Court changed the law on what constituted an official act.”

Ben Cline also criticized Jack Smith for seeking a “gag order” against Donald Trump, because of Trump’s threats to witnesses in the election interference case against him. Cline dishonestly characterized this as violating the “principle that the government doesn’t silence political speech, in particular speech before it happens,” claiming (falsely) that there was no real world harm that you could articulate that justified giving the federal government the power to silence him as a presidential candidate.”  As Jack Smith correctly explained, “The court granted those motions and found that the prosecutor did not have to wait until someone was harmed to make such a motion.” Smith also explained that the Court of Appeals agreed that there was a basis and that the threats to witnesses that came from the targeting by Donald Trump were real, and then we had a duty to protect them.” Cline basically blew that off, strongly implying that Trump’s statements about the cases against him had NOT “intimidated witnesses or prevented them from coming forward.” Again, Smith responded correctly – “I had evidence that he said ‘if you come after me, I’m coming after you’…he suggested a witness should be put to death.” And, Smith added, “The courts found that those sort of statements not only deter witnesses who’ve come forward; they deter witnesses who have yet to come forward.” Yet AGAIN, Cline blew this off, claiming Smith wasn’t “able to identify a single witness who didn’t come forward because they were intimidated by President Trump.” And yet again, Smith corrected Cline’s lying idiocy – “We had extremely thorough evidence that his statements were having an effect on the proceedings that is not permitted in any court of law in the United States.” And yet AGAIN, Cline acted as if these threats to witnesses were all a big joke or something (“I mean, if you can’t identify a single witness who’s intimidated…maybe you should reconsider the gag order.”). WTF? That’s really outrageous by Cline, and by that point most of us would have wanted to tell Clint to go f*** himself. Fortunately, Smith is a professional, kept his cool and responded, “Both courts upheld the orders and it is not incumbent on a prosecutor to wait until someone gets killed before they move for an order to protect the proceedings.” Smith added, again correctly, that “the First Amendment does not allow one to make statements that interfere with the administration of justice in a judicial proceeding” and recalled that, “in the days after Donald Trump made some of these statements, the district court in this case received vile threats, threats to the district court’s life in that environment,” so “I felt a duty as a prosecutor to make that motion, and I make no apologies.” 

Cline, on the other hand, has a lot to apologize for.

Congressman Cline posted this on his campaign Facebook page:

While the Trump administration– the most lawless in American history– violates the Constitution on a daily basis, Cline thinks the only threats to constitutional freedoms are coming from “the left.”

I’ll give the final words to the distinguished constitutional scholar (and anti-fascist) Daffy Duck:

In one of Congressman Cline’s frequent softball interviews with Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business (he spends more time talking with her than he does with his constituents at town halls), he was asked about the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis.

He said:

Well, anytime you have a loss of life, it’s a tragedy. But what we have is law enforcement engaged in enforcing the law. What we need is for Americans to respect that action by law enforcement and to allow law enforcement to continue to do its job. When we see these tragedies occur, to have the governor of Minnesota inflame tensions by talking about using National Guard troops to prevent ICE from doing their job, that’s not only irresponsible and dangerous, that does cross a line.

In other words, no recognition that those who are supposed to be enforcing the law sometimes violate it in horrific ways. No recognition that by terrorizing a community, ICE is making the people of that community less safe. No recognition that local officials have the right to protect residents from abusive and brutal behavior no matter the source.

Cline’s record of publicly justifying or silently accepting everything Trump and his functionaries do or say remains unblemished.

On Thursday 17 Republican members of the House of Representative joined all Democrats to pass a three-year extension health insurance subsidies under the Affordable Care Act.

Is anyone surprised that Congressman Cline was not among them?

The bill now goes to the Senate.

Let’s be clear: Cline’s NO vote was a kick in the teeth to more than 33,000 of his Sixth District constituents who depend on ACA subsidies to keep their health insurance premiums from doubling or tripling.

Not all his Republicans colleagues are as out of touch as Cline is with the people they represent.

“Thirty-thousand people in northeastern Pennsylvania obtain their health insurance through the exchange, and that’s always been my North Star,” said Rep. Rob Bresnahan (R), who represents a swing district in the state. “I think Congress has an obligation to address this. You can’t be a flamingo and stick your head in the sand. I think we need to have tough conversations.”

… And for the fifth year in a row, Congressman Cline has nothing to say about the Trump-incited attack on law enforcement and the effort to overthrow democracy on this day in 2021.

Instead we get this:

Once again:

Cline’s Facebook page: nothing.

Cline’s X account: nothing.

Cline’s website: nothing.

Here’s a reminder of Cline’s actions (and inactions) leading up to 1/6/2021, on the day itself and in the days, weeks and months afterwards.