Sorry, Congressman. Trump isn’t in the clear yet.

After Attorney General William Barr released what he claimed were the “principal conclusions” of the Mueller Report, Congressman Cline was quick to suggest that President Trump was in the clear.

Cline says “all Americans should be pleased with the Mueller Report’s conclusions.” But neither he nor anyone else outside of a handful of people knows what those conclusions are in their entirety.

Cline has said the full report should be released. I hope he stands by that position and that he and the rest of us soon get to see the entire document of more than 300 pages. That means we have yet to see approximately 99.99 percent of the report. Perhaps Cline should reserve judgment– both on its conclusions and on whether it was a waste of money– until we do.

“If you disagree with something the president is doing, tell me.”

From a report in The Northern Virginia Daily about Congressman Cline’s recent town hall meeting in Front Royal.

Cline was also asked if there is any scenario that he would not support President Donald Trump and the Republican Party. He responded that he swore an oath to support the Constitution and he was not elected to “follow any one person.” He added that Trump is “definitely stirring things up in Washington,” has “challenged the status quo” and asked questions on how the federal government became “broken.”

Cline added that he was elected to represent the 6th District as a whole and he is doing his best to that “each and every day.”

“I will continue to do that with your input. If you disagree with something the president is doing, tell me…I don’t agree with anyone 100 percent of the time,” he said.

If you live in the Sixth District and want to tell Congressman Cline that you disagree with something the president is doing, you can contact him via his website or by phone at (202) 225-5431.

Thank you, Congressman Cline


Now can you find the political courage to say something about this?

Or this (in the wake of Charleston, Charlottesville, Pittsburgh and more)?

If not, your pious words mean nothing.

On violence against Native women, Cline follows Goodlatte’s shameful example

In his final days in Congress, Bob Goodlatte distinguished himself– but not in a good way.

As chair of the House Judiciary Committee, Goodlatte single-handedly blocked Congressional approval of Savanna’s Act, a bill to protect Native American women from violence. The bill had been passed in the Senate by unanimous consent.

Now it seems Ben Cline, Goodlatte’s successor as representative for Virginia’s Sixth Congressional District, has decided to follow Goodlatte’s shamefully insensitive example when it comes to the violence that Native American women suffer.

House Republicans on Wednesday quietly tried to repeal a major provision in the Violence Against Women Act that helps tribes respond to horrific levels of violence directed at Native American women by non-Native men on tribal lands.

During a House Judiciary Committee markup on the 2019 bill to reauthorize the law, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) offered an amendment to repeal provisions in the 2013 law that give tribes jurisdiction over non-Native people who commit crimes of domestic violence, dating violence or who violate a protection order against a victim on tribal land.

He claimed that non-Native domestic abusers’ constitutional rights might not be upheld if they harm a Native woman on tribal land and have to go before a tribal court. His amendment would have also stripped out new language in the 2019 bill to expand tribes’ jurisdiction over non-Native abusers who commit crimes of sex trafficking, stalking and violence against law enforcement officers on tribal land.

Tribes fought hard to add this provision to the Violence Against Women Act ― they nearly lost ― because, prior to 2013, jurisdiction over non-Native abusers on tribal land fell to federal or state law enforcement, who are often hours away from reservations and lack the resources to respond. That meant non-Native abusers on tribal lands were essentially immune from punishment and could keep being violent. Thanks to the provision, tribal law enforcement now has the ability to intervene.

Native women on reservations experience violence at appallingly high rates. More than 84 percent of indigenous women experience violence in their lifetime, and the vast majority of Native victims of violence ― 96 percent of women and 89 percent of men ― report being victimized by a non-Native person. Native women are also mysteriously going missing and being murdered.

The Judiciary Committee defeated Sensenbrenner’s amendment along party lines; among the nine Republicans voting for it was Congressman Cline.

Richard Sneed, principal chief of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, said he’s happy to talk to any lawmakers about why the tribal provision in the Violence Against Women Act is vital.

“We are very concerned that members of the House Judiciary Committee tried to take away our sovereign right to prosecute domestic and dating violence perpetrators in the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act,” Sneed said in a statement. “Leaders from Tribes have fought for years to protect our Native women and children through strengthening our Tribal courts. VAWA was an integral component of exercising our tribal sovereignty to protect the most vulnerable amongst us.”

Perhaps Cline should have a word with Mr. Sneed. He might learn something.